tagaroo

Rating Scales

13 articles

Every measurement decision in a clinical or behavioral study eventually runs through an instrument: which scale you pick, how its anchors are worded, and where its cutoffs sit determine what your data can and cannot say. These articles treat rating scales as working tools rather than static PDFs—item structures, scoring rules, psychometric properties, and the licensing fine print that projects tend to discover too late.

The recurring theme is coding from language. A scale like the PHQ-9 or the TLC was validated under specific administration conditions, and rating it from an interview transcript is its own skill—anchor by anchor, with the boundary cases spelled out. We compare instruments that target the same construct, unpack what a total score actually summarizes, and flag where common practice drifts from what the original validation papers support.

Scale facts cited here—item counts, ranges, thresholds—are transcribed from primary sources with DOIs, and each post links to the corresponding entry in the Tagaroo Scale Library where the instrument exists as a guided annotation workflow.